https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3KZ6mIsbDc4
The poor image is a copy in motion. Its quality is bad, its resolution substandard.
The poor image is a rag or a rip; an AVI or a JPEG, a lumpen proletarian in the class society of appearances, ranked and valued according to its resolution.
图像也有三六九等，
<aside> <img src="/icons/question-mark_gray.svg" alt="/icons/question-mark_gray.svg" width="40px" />
What are the condition that you have encountered “poor image”?
</aside>
<aside> <img src="/icons/question-mark_gray.svg" alt="/icons/question-mark_gray.svg" width="40px" />
How do you see the difference between different resolutions? What are the values you subconsciously give to them?
</aside>
<aside> <img src="/icons/question-mark_gray.svg" alt="/icons/question-mark_gray.svg" width="40px" />
In terms of films, memes and artworks, in what way would you treat poor image?
</aside>
<aside> <img src="/icons/question-mark_gray.svg" alt="/icons/question-mark_gray.svg" width="40px" />
Something ignored— What is the value of poor and flawed quality of the image?
</aside>
清晰度代表对现实的还原，越“现实”的东西总是越贵的，就好像3A游戏总是追求的是最贵的表现。At the same time, resolution is a kind